Home Uncategorized Should The Most Violent Society Lead?

Should The Most Violent Society Lead?

SHARE

“International” authorities keep pressuring Greece to conform to “austerity“. But what does “international” mean? It means the domineering socio-economic order, inspired by? Inspired by violence. As I will show.

The basic story of the present Greek tragedy is the following: (some) plutocrats stole (gigantic amounts of) money from their accomplices the banksters. States and institutions (IMF, ECB, Fed, etc.) then stepped in, and replenished the banks which their own management, banksters, and plutocrats had just stolen. No attempt was made to recover the money from the plutocrats who had stolen the, now apparently, but not really, ruined, plutocrats (pulling the strings from behind).

Then the governments and said “international” institutions turned around and asked the Greek Public to compensate for all the money those worthies had given to the banks. The same request was made everywhere, thus all sorts of budgets, from social services, to defense, to fundamental research, were slashed (even in the USA; the big exception is… China, where bankers toe the line fixed by the state more carefully).

This replenishment of the banksters by the Public was, and is, the world’s greatest fraud, ever perpetrated. It’s closely related to the following. Where did the money go?

70 trillion dollars (70,000 billion dollars) of stolen money rest in Tax Havens (source: Alain Bauer, a renowned world criminologist). Not even counting the hidden money in the world’s two largest tax havens, Britain (Great or not), and the USA.

The worthies, our great leaders,  having bought their own elections, know the ropes… Or know enough about the ropes, not to ask too many questions. Clearly this situation, overall, this gigantic conspiracy, this cover-up, is, all together, an act of the greatest violence.

Could it be related to the enormous violence of the country which leads this show? Here are some international comparisons; the USA leads in violence:

USA Violence Is Not Just About Guns. Jail, God, & Paying For Everything Is Also Part of It.
USA Violence Is Not Just About Guns. Jail, God, & Paying For Everything Is Also Part of It.

USA Violence Is Not Just About Guns. Jail, God, & Paying For Everything Is Also Part of It.

[Homicide by guns is just one metric of violence in the USA; there are worse ones, such as having to fork out 100K for a university education with the elite. Interestingly, there are no national statistics, in the USA, on police violence; judicial violence can be measured, by the millions which “justice” processes… violently; no such luck with those police processes… Or should we say, dispatches?]

Violence is both cause and consequence, feeding on itself. Violence is not just about killing people. Incarcerating them is also violent. Even The Economist recently observed that the USA was “Jail Nation”. Having a violent God, accepting money rules all, including elections, is also part of the violence.

No less than 8 million citizens of the USA are either in jail, or under suspended sentences, probation, etc. In a society with that much legal (and thus, police) violence it is only natural that it spills all over.

My point? Who controls, who has built, most of the world’s institutions? The USA (observe the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, and where the IMF and the World Bank sit: not even half a mile from the White House). So, if the ideology and practice of the USA is impregnated with violence, it’s an ideology of violence which controls everything, and especially economic theory.

Even Academia is hyper violent in the USA; to attend Harvard what you need is beaucoup bucks. Harvard and the like cost around 100,000 dollars a year. That’s why I call them “plutocratic universities“.

Obama himself pointed out last week that the homicidal rate in the USA is 49 times that of France. That’s satanic. I know many Americans are bad, but do they deserve to be eliminated at 50 times the rate of Frenchmen?

Homicides, guns and violence are related markers, and marks of society. There is a relationship with the Human Development Index. Notice, in all these comparisons, that small countries don’t really matter. Comparing republics such as France and the USA has meaning: both are republics, both have independent defense systems, and worldwide empires (France controls nearly 11 million square kilometers, the USA nearly double this).

However, a small poodle such as Sweden will follow the orders Washington gives, and Luxembourg, with less than 1% of the population of France, and no industry, but for corruption, follow the wishes of all and any plutocrat.

The Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI)[9] is a “measure of the average level of human development of people in a society once inequality is taken into account.”

Note: The green arrows (Increase), red arrows (Decrease), and blue dashes (Steady) represent changes in rank. The changes in rank are not relative to the HDI list above, but are according to the source (p. 168) calculated with the exclusion of countries which are missing IHDI data.

n

    n

  1.  Norway 0.891 (Steady)
  2. n

  3.  Australia 0.860 (Steady)
  4. n

  5.  Netherlands 0.854 (Increase 1)
  6. n

  7.   Switzerland 0.847 (Increase 3)
  8. n

  9.  Germany 0.846 (Steady)
  10. n

  11.  Iceland 0.843 (Increase 2)
  12. n

  13.  Sweden 0.840 (Decrease 4)
  14. n

  15.  Denmark 0.838 (Increase 1)
  16. n

  17.  Canada 0.833 (Increase 4)
  18. n

  19.  Ireland 0.832 (Decrease 4)
  20. n

  21.  Finland 0.830 (Steady)
  22. n

  23.  Slovenia 0.824 (Decrease 2)
  24. n

  25.  Austria 0.818 (Decrease 1)
  26. n

  27.  Luxembourg 0.814 (Increase 3)
  28. n

  29.  Czech Republic 0.813 (Decrease 1)
  30. n

  31.  United Kingdom 0.812 (Increase 3)
  32. n

  33.  Belgium 0.806 (Decrease 2)
  34. n

  35.  France 0.804 (Steady)
  36. n

  37.  Japan 0.799 (New)
  38. n

  39.  Israel 0.793 (Increase 1)
  40. n

  41.  Slovakia 0.778 (Increase 1)
  42. n

  43.  Spain 0.775 (Decrease 2)
  44. n

  45.  Italy 0.768 (Increase 1)
  46. n

  47.  Estonia 0.767 (Increase 1)
  48. n

  49.  Greece 0.762 (Increase 2)
  50. n

  51.  Malta 0.760 (Decrease 3)
  52. n

  53.  Hungary 0.757 (Decrease 1)
  54. n

  55.  United States 0.755 (Decrease 12)
  56. n

  57.  Poland 0.751 (Increase 1)
  58. n

  59.  Cyprus 0.752 (Decrease 1)
  60. n

  61.  Lithuania 0.746 (Increase 2)
  62. n

  63.  Portugal 0.739 (Steady)
  64. n

  65.  South Korea 0.736 (Decrease 5)
  66. n

  67.  Latvia 0.725 (Increase 1)
  68. n

  69.  Croatia 0.721 (Increase 4)
  70. n

  71.  Argentina 0.680 (Increase 7)
  72. n

  73.  Chile 0.661 (Increase 4)
  74. n

n

Countries in the top quartile of HDI (“very high human development” group) with a missing IHDI: New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, Liechtenstein, Brunei, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Andorra, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Cuba, and Kuwait

The most violent country ought not to lead: it’s as if one chose the local violent drunkard as the leader. However, it’s precisely because they are stupid and violent that bullies lead. Thus a paradox: the worst, are most esteemed.

Just after five Islamist attack in five countries around the old Roman Imperium, killed more than 70 people in 24 hours, including more than 40 in Tunisia, it may feel strange that I focus  on the USA. However, Americanism and Islamism are directly related, these days.

Islamism was quasi-inexistent in, say, 1948. It is the implementation of the Great Bitter Lake Conspiracy, a plot elaborated in Washington, and more exactly from the “democratic” advisers around president Roosevelt,  which fabricated the rule of Islamism (though the good works and financing of the Saudi plutocrats).

The mentality imposed by lords of the USA brought us Islamism, and the sort of tricks played on Greece. And they belong to a class. This so-called “Deep State” was animated, already a century ago, by individuals such as the Harriman brothers. (The Wikipedia link gives none of the savory details, where countries such as France, Nazi Germany, and the USSR figure prominently.)

There is a war against democracy, but its ways are subtle enough to escape the understanding of the baffled masses.

Patrice Ayme’

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here